ScalePad
ControlMapCMMC

CMMC readiness your MSP can deliver repeatedly

ControlMap helps MSPs manage CMMC 2.0 readiness, run NIST 800-171A assessments, and organize the SSP, SPRS, POA&M, shared responsibility, and evidence work that clients need on the path to certification.

Book a DemoView frameworks

WHY NOW

CMMC is a contract-readiness conversation

Defense contractors and subcontractors need a clear way to protect Federal Contract Information and Controlled Unclassified Information. MSPs can help by turning the framework into a practical readiness program instead of a one-time assessment.

Acme Corp

Acme Corp / Frameworks

CMMC 2.0 Assessment

SPRS Score: -192

Compliance Overview

26%

14 / 53compliant

Not assessed6 of 53
Compliant14 of 53
Partially compliant29 of 53
In review0 of 53
Not compliant4 of 53
Not applicable100 of 153

Overall Progress

142 of 320 assessment questions answered.

44% Answered

Completion

44%

+13%

since Apr 06

91

Yes

24

Partial

27

No

178

Open

Progress History

Assessment completion over time.

+13%
25%50%75%AprMayJun

42%

Apr

54%

May

68%

Jun

Domain Readiness

Priority areas for the CMMC Level 2 assessment.

AC: Access Control

3 gaps remaining

72%
15 yes4 partial3 no

AT: Awareness Training

2 gaps remaining

58%
7 yes2 partial2 no

AU: Audit Logging

1 gaps remaining

84%
11 yes1 partial1 no

CM: Configuration

4 gaps remaining

64%
9 yes3 partial4 no

IA: Identification

2 gaps remaining

76%
12 yes2 partial2 no

IR: Incident Response

5 gaps remaining

42%
5 yes2 partial5 no

RA: Risk Assessment

1 gaps remaining

91%
14 yes1 partial1 no

SC: System Comms

3 gaps remaining

68%
10 yes3 partial3 no

01

FCI and CUI scope

Help clients identify whether they are dealing with Federal Contract Information, Controlled Unclassified Information, or both.

  • Contract clauses
  • Data flow review
  • Scope decisions

02

Level 1 and Level 2 paths

Separate foundational self-assessment work from the deeper Level 2 readiness path tied to NIST SP 800-171.

  • FAR 52.204-21
  • NIST SP 800-171
  • Assessment planning

03

MSP responsibility

Document where the MSP, client, and third-party tools touch regulated systems so accountability is visible.

  • Shared Responsibility Matrix
  • Tool scope
  • Client ownership

CMMC WORKFLOW

Everything MSPs need to manage the path to certification

ControlMap supports CMMC Level 1 and 2 readiness, NIST 800-171 mapping, NIST 800-171A assessments, SPRS scoring, SSP work, POA&Ms, evidence, and shared responsibility.

Acme Corp

Acme Corp / Frameworks

CMMC 2.0 Assessment

SPRS Score: -192

Compliance Overview

26%

14 / 53compliant

Not assessed6 of 53
Compliant14 of 53
Partially compliant29 of 53
In review0 of 53
Not compliant4 of 53
Not applicable100 of 153

Overall Progress

142 of 320 assessment questions answered.

44% Answered

Completion

44%

+13%

since Apr 06

91

Yes

24

Partial

27

No

178

Open

Progress History

Assessment completion over time.

+13%
25%50%75%AprMayJun

42%

Apr

54%

May

68%

Jun

Domain Readiness

Priority areas for the CMMC Level 2 assessment.

AC: Access Control

3 gaps remaining

72%
15 yes4 partial3 no

AT: Awareness Training

2 gaps remaining

58%
7 yes2 partial2 no

AU: Audit Logging

1 gaps remaining

84%
11 yes1 partial1 no

CM: Configuration

4 gaps remaining

64%
9 yes3 partial4 no

IA: Identification

2 gaps remaining

76%
12 yes2 partial2 no

IR: Incident Response

5 gaps remaining

42%
5 yes2 partial5 no

RA: Risk Assessment

1 gaps remaining

91%
14 yes1 partial1 no

SC: System Comms

3 gaps remaining

68%
10 yes3 partial3 no

01

Readiness assessments

Run checks using CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 frameworks mapped to NIST 800-171 controls and NIST 800-171A assessment criteria.

  • Level 1 and Level 2
  • NIST 800-171A
  • Readiness checks

02

POA&M and SPRS

Convert findings into Plans of Action and Milestones, then calculate and report SPRS scores.

  • Owners and due dates
  • SPRS scoring
  • Progress tracking

03

SSP and accountability

Generate and maintain System Security Plans and define what is owned by the MSP versus the client.

  • SSP builder
  • Shared Responsibility Matrix
  • Client workspace

DELIVERY MODEL

From first CMMC question to audit-ready evidence

Turn CMMC demand into a repeatable service line: scope the environment, assess controls, document gaps, manage remediation, and keep evidence current for client and assessor conversations.

  1. 01

    Scope the environment

    Identify contract drivers, CUI and FCI boundaries, relevant systems, MSP access, third-party tools, and responsibility boundaries.

  2. 02

    Assess the controls

    Run structured readiness work against CMMC Level 1 or Level 2 expectations and the applicable NIST SP 800-171 assessment criteria.

  3. 03

    Build SSP, SPRS, and POA&M

    Turn assessment findings into a living System Security Plan, SPRS score, remediation plan, owners, milestones, and due dates.

  4. 04

    Operationalize evidence

    Link controls, policies, evidence, CUI labels, recurring reviews, and client responsibilities so proof stays current.

  5. 05REPEATABLE SERVICE

    Prepare for review

    Package evidence and reports for readiness reviews, assessor conversations, and ongoing client governance.

AUDIT-READY

Keep CMMC evidence traceable

ControlMap organizes evidence by control and keeps the surrounding context with it: owners, due dates, control status, CUI indicators, SSP artifacts, and shared responsibility. The goal is to make every requirement, milestone, and supporting artifact easier to verify.

CMMC should be a structured service line, not a 100-hour scramble every time.

Acme Corp

Acme Corp / Evidence

Automated Evidence Collection

20%complete

Evidence Progress

20 Completed
20 In Progress
20 In Review
20 Not Started
20 Not Applicable

Collected Evidence

5 recent checks mapped to controls automatically.

3 Passing
AppEvidenceIntegrationStatusCollected
Google Cloud

KMS encryption keys rotate every 90 days

GCP-CMAP-1-10 / AC-3

Google Cloud Project One

Passing

4 min ago

Google Cloud

Service account keys are managed by GCP

GCP-CMAP-1-4 / IA-5

Google Cloud Project One

Failing

12 min ago

Microsoft 365

MFA enforced for all privileged users

M365-CMAP-2-1 / IA-2

Microsoft 365 Tenant

Passing

18 min ago

CrowdStrike

Endpoint protection is active on managed systems

CS-CMAP-4-7 / SI-3

CrowdStrike Falcon

Passing

22 min ago

AWS

Public S3 bucket access remains restricted

AWS-CMAP-3-2 / SC-7

AWS Production

Disabled

1 hr ago

CUI labels and linked evidence

Tag evidence and assets that contain Controlled Unclassified Information and keep the proof tied to related controls.

SSP builder

Maintain the system story alongside assessment work so the SSP reflects the environment clients actually operate.

POA&M and SPRS reporting

Convert findings into Plans of Action and Milestones with owners, due dates, and score reporting.

Shared Responsibility Matrix

Make clear what the MSP owns, what the client owns, and where third-party platforms are part of the control story.

Assessor-friendly packages

Prepare evidence and reports for readiness review and third-party assessment conversations.

GovCloud option

Support higher-assurance deployment conversations where client contracts or data sensitivity require them.

MSP SERVICE PACKAGING

Turn CMMC work into a managed compliance motion

The strongest CMMC story is not just feature coverage. It is the ability to sell, deliver, and maintain a client-ready compliance program without rebuilding the process each time.

Acme Corp

Acme Corp / Assessments

Common Assessment

Assessment Grade

Current cybersecurity posture based on common assessment responses.

History
FEDCBAA+

Answering Progress

285 of 749 questions answered.

History

38%

answered

Yes126 / 749
No48 / 749
Partially87 / 749
Not applicable24 / 749
Not answered464 / 749

Framework Progress

Common answers mapped to supported frameworks.

3 Active
S2
B

SOC 2

148 / 269

N
B

NIST CSF

82 / 119

PCI
C

PCI DSS

96 / 144

Action Items

Prioritized recommendations from answered assessment questions.

147 Open
Critical

2

High

4

Medium

52

Low

11

Addressed

18

Not addressed

60

Question Group Progress

Coverage across the common assessment library.

285 Answered

71%

Security & Privacy Governance

10 of 14 answered

28%

Asset Management

9 of 32 answered

38%

Business Continuity

15 of 40 answered

67%

Capacity Planning

2 of 3 answered

14%

Change Management

2 of 14 answered

41%

Cloud Security

7 of 17 answered

20%

Configuration Management

4 of 20 answered

16%

Continuous Monitoring

6 of 37 answered

01

Assessment-as-a-service

Use CMMC discovery and readiness checks to create a paid starting point for defense-adjacent clients.

  • Scope
  • Score
  • Gap report

02

Remediation roadmap

Turn failed objectives into projects, initiatives, owners, budgets, and timelines clients can approve.

  • POA&M
  • Milestones
  • Accountability

03

Ongoing vCISO retainer

Keep evidence, policies, risks, and controls current after the first readiness push.

  • Recurring reviews
  • Executive reporting
  • Continuous readiness

CMMC FAQ

Questions MSPs need to answer early

ControlMap helps MSPs organize CMMC readiness, documentation, evidence, and service delivery while certification decisions stay with the appropriate assessment path.

  • Does ControlMap certify a client for CMMC?
    No. ControlMap helps MSPs organize readiness work, evidence, reports, SSPs, SPRS scoring, POA&Ms, and responsibility mapping. Certification and formal assessment decisions remain part of the CMMC assessment ecosystem.
  • When is Level 2 usually in scope?
    Level 2 becomes relevant when Controlled Unclassified Information is in scope. It is tied to the NIST SP 800-171 security requirements, so clients need a documented way to assess, remediate, and maintain those controls.
  • Why do SSP, SPRS, and POA&M matter?
    They turn readiness into something concrete. The SSP describes the system and control implementation, SPRS captures the assessment score, and POA&Ms track remediation commitments, owners, and milestones.
  • How does this scale for MSPs?
    Reusable frameworks, tenant patterns, shared responsibility mapping, evidence workflows, and recurring reporting help an MSP deliver CMMC as a repeatable service instead of a custom project for every client.

READY?

Turn CMMC demand into a repeatable MSP service.

Book a Demo